Both, actually.
We've been using chlorhexidine which we get by the gallon from a feed store for the chickens. Its pretty mild, and is supposed to leave a protective residue. However I really should add about 10% denatured alcohol to it, as while it is a hospital disinfectant and kill virii on hands, it may not be as potent as some others.
The ideal disinfectant is bleach, but it can be corrosive to clothing, and is a strong irritant. Quats such as lysol are not as irritating, and may be more potent, we have simply ran out of it - and are not quite up to doing a Walmart run.
Currently we are using standard quat wipes on hands and gloves outside, chlorhexidine for hands and clothing in the truck and wiping off purchases and mail and shoes, and putting outer clothing in the back bathroom with a 30W UV-C/Ozone Generator for around 30 minutes. Nothing would survive that. I almost didnt when I went in momentarily to toss in some stuff after it had been running for a while. Need to wait a few hours for the ozone to degrade after turning off. Block door bottoms. And dont look at the light. UV-C is not found on earth (except in stratosphere) and will easily cause skin burns and glaucoma.
One of the most potent disinfectants is hypochlorous acid, which is one of the things your white blood cells uses to kill boogers, along with the less potent peroxide. Its very mild, but quite expensive - though it can be made for pennies at home with a computer power supply (just short the green wires).
All this may seem a bit extreme, as well it is. But keep in mind that this is an *engineered* booger, designed to be less lethal than SARS and MERS.
Perhaps for a reason.
Addendum:
I can understand the logic behind the 'anti-covidians' who regard the wuflu as some kind of hyped up conspiracy.
While the Case Fatality Rate (sick/dead) is around 5% we have seen no CFR numbers for the regular flu of those sick enough to be hospitalized over it.
Plus the exposed (antibody+) / fatality rate, from the numbers I have seen is around 0.25%. Lower than the 'official' 0.3% for the 'normal' flu.
Looks like a tempest in a teapot.
BUT
The problem is the *specificity* of the antibody testing - which from all reports will cause false positives from nearly *any* coronavirus exposure. That includes normal flu to seasonal colds. Numbers showing approximately 20% positive.
And then there are false negatives. Like on the cruise ships. The problem being with the still used swab testing that relies on the back of the throat. Where the virus only exists for a few days. Even in those dead from it, you would have to go far into the lower lungs to find it.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/lipiroy/202...iting-for/
The *flu* does NOT do this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disseminat...oagulation
So, we really havent a clue as to what this boogers numbers really are.
Or what they will be from residual effects on the major organ systems.
The biochemists are typically a decade ahead of doctors. And their data are cause for extreme concern.
