US military funds 'vanishing' tech
#1
US military funds Mission Impossible 'vanishing' tech

[Image: uIe6Jsj.jpg]
Martin Landau (left) played Rollin Hand in the original Mission Impossible TV series

The US military is funding a project to develop electronics that can self-destruct like the secret messages in the Mission Impossible TV show.

Darpa, the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, has awarded computing giant IBM a $3.5m (£2.1m) contract to work on its Vanishing Programmable Resources (VAPR) project.

It is looking to develop a class of "transient" electronics that can be destroyed by remote control.

The kit could be used in combat zones.

IBM's proposal involves the use of a radio frequency trigger that could shatter a glass coating on a silicon chip and turn it into powder.

"A trigger, such as a fuse or a reactive metal layer will be used to initiate shattering, in at least one location, on the glass substrate," the US government said in its grant award notice.

Darpa wants to develop large distributed networks of sensors that can collect and transmit data for a limited period and then be destroyed instantly to prevent them falling into enemy hands.

VAPR tech could also have applications in medical diagnosis and treatment, Darpa believes, if sensors can be developed that the body can reabsorb.

The Pentagon's research arm also granted $2.1m to Xerox company, Palo Alto Research Center (Parc) - a specialist in bioinformatics and large-area electronics.

Its proposed solution is similar to IBM's and relies on the materials being engineered under stress, so that when an electrical signal is received, the circuit crumbles into dust instantly as the stress is released.

Other companies involved in the VAPR transient electronics project include Honeywell Aerospace, awarded $2.5m, and SRI International, awarded $4.7m, late last year.

Honeywell's microelectronics experts are looking to develop components that would decompose naturally when they are no longer needed - a new take on the old "built-in obsolescence" concept.

source
Reply
#2
if you're gonna do something, do it right... why can't we just stick a little bit of c4 to the chips?
Reply
#3
because snowden and assenge is proved become more deadly than any Bio Weapons....
Reply
#4
assange? isn't he still hiding in the restroom at the ecuadorian embassy?

seriously though... they are investing a lot of money into something that can be solved with something as simple as a high explosive. now, if the bulk of that money is to safeguard the triggering system, i can understand that, but it seems like the majority of it will be going into the destructive part of the system.
Reply
#5
(Feb 08, 2014, 20:52 pm)stormium Wrote: assange? isn't he still hiding in the restroom at the ecuadorian embassy?

that explains the leak on their budget...Big GrinBig GrinBig Grin

rather than spending lots of dollars in papers that can be pulverized from distances...I prefer to spent it to invented an artificial human language that so hard to understand and can bring disinformation's to the one that not authorized to read it...
English is one step ahead in this...if you add some this and that on it and pay someone from 3rd world country to read the vocabulary...
Big GrinBig GrinBig GrinBig GrinBig GrinBig Grin
Reply
#6
(Feb 08, 2014, 22:51 pm)Picklock Wrote: rather than spending lots of dollars in papers that can be pulverized from distances...I prefer to spent it to invented an artificial human language that so hard to understand and can bring disinformation's to the one that not authorized to read it...
English is one step ahead in this...if you add some this and that on it and pay someone from 3rd world country to read the vocabulary...
Big GrinBig GrinBig GrinBig GrinBig GrinBig Grin

An easier way would be to use an obscure, mostly-dead language that only the sender and receiver are fluent in; one example would be the code talkers from World War I and World War II.
Reply
#7
(Feb 09, 2014, 03:16 am)System Folder Wrote: An easier way would be to use an obscure, mostly-dead language that only the sender and receiver are fluent in; one example would be the code talkers from World War I and World War II.

so...that's mean talking Murlokian is useful after all...
Big GrinBig GrinBig GrinBig GrinBig Grin
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Funds sought for tiny £6 computer LowOrbit 0 15,362 May 11, 2015, 13:27 pm
Last Post: LowOrbit
  Tech sites lead on April Fools gags Scrumptious 0 12,511 Apr 01, 2015, 07:46 am
Last Post: Scrumptious
  Russian Law Demanding User Data Remain On Russian Soil Could Ban Apple Tech Mike 1 14,873 Nov 09, 2014, 03:01 am
Last Post: Tophat
  Wearable tech can monitor dog health Scrumptious 0 12,149 Nov 03, 2014, 16:13 pm
Last Post: Scrumptious
  Shape-shifting tech 'defeats hacks' Scrumptious 1 12,839 Jan 23, 2014, 10:23 am
Last Post: ddoking007



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)