US: Biden admin. cancels Trump's logging-burning project at Henry's Fork
#1
Henrys Fork (Snake River tributary) is located in Idaho.
[Image: 4.jpg]


[Image: 5.jpg]



Last December the Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Native Ecosystems Council, and Yellowstone to Uintas Connection took the Trump administration's U.S. Forest Service to federal court over plans to massively log and burn over 40,000 acres in the very headwaters of the world-famous Henry’s Fork of the Snake River. We are exceptionally pleased to announce that due to the very serious legal challenges we brought as well as the change in administrations, the Middle Henry's Fork project has been canceled.

The clear waters wind through the mile-high caldera on the border of Yellowstone National Park. The headwaters of this huge drainage contain what's left of the Caribou-Targhee National Forest's old-growth stands and provides irreplaceable habitat for grizzly bear, lynx, wolverine, gray wolf, boreal toad, Columbia spotted frog, American three-toed woodpecker, boreal owl, great gray owl, bald eagle, northern hoshawk, peregrine falcon, trumpeter swan, elk, marten, moose, mule deer, and snowshoe hare.

The Forest Service decision called for logging and burning an astounding 42,274 acres of the Henry’s Fork watershed — more than one-third of the drainage's 120,000 acres — which is the largest on the entire Caribou-Targhee National Forest.

It should come as no surprise that the Trump administration was trying to stuff this project through in the final days of his environmentally disastrous presidency. But using a “Categorical Exclusion” to exempt the entire project from National Environmental Policy Act was an over-the-top abuse. Categorical Exclusions were originally intended for minor routine maintenance needs like painting outhouses — not massive clearcutting and burning projects in grizzly bear and lynx habitat on the border of Yellowstone National Park.

By not taking the legally required "hard look at direct or indirect effects," the Forest Service implied there would have been no cumulative effects — a wholly unwarranted assumption since the agency didn’t even bother to document existing conditions or the project’s potential impacts.

Moreover, by not conducting any environmental impact analysis or allowing public review and comment the Forest Service violated the National Environmental Policy Act, misrepresented the presence of endangered species in the project area, and ignored the requirements of its own Targhee Forest Plan.

In conclusion, this was a horrific plan to decimate remaining old-growth forest at the cost of dumping sediment in the headwaters of the world-famous Henry's Fork of the Snake River and destroying critical habitat for a vast range of endangered and native species.



[Image: 6.jpg]


[Image: 7.jpg]



https://missoulian.com/opinion/columnist...c00d0.html
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Worldly Trump. Lovem or hatem? stts2 10 1,222,448 Nov 06, 2024, 02:45 am
Last Post: stts2
  Is trump right? kkkeaae 20 15,348 Oct 22, 2024, 04:15 am
Last Post: Mošna
  Hunter Biden Laptop maat84 1 4,153 Sep 16, 2024, 21:00 pm
Last Post: maat84
  Democratic House Investigations of Trump Mega Thread politux 47 96,246 Sep 09, 2024, 03:19 am
Last Post: HalfWollf
  Democratic Lawmaker Slams Project 2025 As ‘Un-American’ DocMack 0 1,000 Jun 15, 2024, 21:57 pm
Last Post: DocMack



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)