DOJ Says Company That Vetted Snowden Faked 665,000 Background Checks
#1
When we last checked in on USIS, the contracting firm which large parts of the federal government and the intelligence community used to conduct background checks on employees (including Ed Snowden), we noted that it had been caught falsifying reports and claiming to have interviewed dead people. At the time, we noted at least one USIS employee had been accused of submitting 1,600 falsified credit reports. But, apparently, the story goes much, much deeper. The DOJ is now accusing USIS of faking background checks on 665,000 federal employees.

Not only that, but the practice of scamming the government seems to have been the official policy of the organization, clearly described in various emails. Basically, USIS was paid based on each completed background check, and realized it was a lot more profitable to "complete" them by not doing most of the actual work (pricey!) and just take the money (profits!).

Quote: Beginning in at least March 2008 and continuing through at least September 2012, USIS management devised and executed a scheme to deliberately circumvent contractually required quality reviews of completed background investigations in order to increase the company’s revenues and profits. Specifically, USIS devised a practice referred to internally as “dumping” or “flushing,” which involved releasing cases to OPM and representing them as complete when, in fact, not all ROIs comprising those cases had received a quality review as required by the Fieldwork Contracts.

USIS engaged in the practice of dumping in order to meet budgeted goals and, therefore, increase its revenues and profits. Given that USIS was paid by OPM for each completed case, the more cases USIS completed each month the more money it received from OPM. USIS’s dumping practices also enabled the company to receive annual performance incentive payments that it would not otherwise have been entitled to receive absent the dumping

Oh, and it became so profitable, they set up a computer program to help them defraud the government and not complete background checks. No joke.

Quote: Initially, USIS would dump cases manually. Soon after the dumping started, however, USIS began using a software program called Blue Zone to assist in the dumping practices. Through Blue Zone, USIS was able to identify a large number of background investigations, quickly make an electronic “Review Complete” notation indicating that the ROIs at issue had gone through the review process even if they had not, and then automatically release all of those ROIs to OPM with the “Review Complete” notation attached. By using Blue Zone, USIS was able to substantially increase the number of background investigations that could be dumped in a short time period.

You have to hand it to them. Not only did they figure out how to scam the government, they sure as hell did it efficiently. That's the American spirit at work!

In fact, it appears this became a key part of how USIS worked. Originally, it would only "dump" unfinished cases at the end of each day if it was behind schedule. But, later it realized it could get paid more by dumping these cases repeatedly during the day. No need to build up a queue, just dump... and get paid.

The DOJ also has emails showing that senior management was well aware this was going on and even participated or encouraged the activity.

Quote: Internal USIS documents confirm that USIS Senior Management was aware of and directed the dumping practices. For example, in one undated internal document, a USIS employee discussing the dumping practices stated: “They will dump cases when word comes from above, such as from [the President of Investigative Service Division] and [the President/CEO]. In the past, [the President of Investigative Service Division] and [the President/CEO] have told us to clear out our shelves in order to hit revenue. When this is done they will dump all [priority code] 6. If [the President of Investigative Service Division] and [the President/CEO] tell them they need to clear out more then they will dump [priority code] 5’s.... Last July through September we were dumping all [priority code] 4, 5, and 6’s per [the President of Investigative Service Division] and [the President/CEO].”

Another email chain dated September 16 and 17, 2010 involving USIS’s Vice President of Field Operations and its President of Investigative Service Division, among others, discussed the need to dump cases to meet revenue goals. The Vice President of Field Operations referenced USIS’s revenue situation as “[w]e all own this baby, and right now we are holding one ugly baby.” The USIS Workload Leader in Western Pennsylvania forwarded that email to the Director of National Quality Assurance and the Quality Control Manager in Western Pennsylvania and responded: “The only two things we can do in review to get them out faster is to (a) hire or (b) dump.... I don’t know if there’s any other levers left to flip other than dumping everything we know is bad. Just a side note, the more MSPC [Master Scheduling Production Control] rams through, the more the field will transmit sub-standards, and the more [the number of cases needing secondary review] will go up. Come EOM [End of Month], if they’re going to tell us to just dump all those cases anyways without a proper review, which [sic] will only make that ugly baby even uglier...”

There's also an email in which a "Workload Leader" tells the top "quality" assurance execs:

Quote: "Shelves are as clean as they could get. Flushed everything like a dead goldfish."

Oh, and another:

Quote: "t'is Flushy McFlushershon at his merry hijinks again!! **leprechaun dance**...I'm not tired..."

So, remember, folks, when Senator Dianne Feinstein insists the NSA would never abuse your privacy because they're professional, just realize that many of those "professionals" might not have actually gone through a background check, because it was taking away profits from a private contractor to actually do its job.

Source
Reply
#2
Ha. I can't pass a fucking background check and employers look at me as if I'm shit, even though I'm just a young guy that fucked up once in his life, yet all these people who's background checks weren't actually done are potentially great employees. I just love the system.
Reply
#3
Once again the government is retarded, we know this. The sealed the records of a chick i have seen a background run on so we could not report that she killed both her kids. (we found newspaper articles but couldn't report it to the daycare she was working for because the records were sealed)

I am not the smartest person in the world but i think when you run a background check on them if they ever killed their own kids you should be able to report it to the daycare even if you can't for working at McDonald's, because noone should be taking care of kids if they killed their own. (not accident, they drove the care in the lake with them in it and let them drown)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Seedbox company policy wanderer 13 32,390 Nov 09, 2024, 02:36 am
Last Post: Ghettosaint
  Just thought I'd share this since some guy on reddit says he can't ioio32l 2 15,815 Aug 06, 2021, 19:46 pm
Last Post: Moe
  Site says there are 3 seed but nothing downloading soulcity 8 18,774 Aug 29, 2019, 00:52 am
Last Post: waregim
  'Sonic Attack' on U.S. Embassy in Cuba Was Actually Crickets, Study Says neanderthal 6 16,444 Jan 15, 2019, 19:29 pm
Last Post: dueda
  Reaching 1,000 posts workerbee 33 61,826 Dec 30, 2016, 06:25 am
Last Post: joew771



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)