How to stop Donald Trump

[connor17]

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...-democrats
"Clinton establishment’s mix of socially inclusive rhetoric and neoliberal economics is a weak response to xenophobic populism."
"we need something to fight for, not just something to fight against."

If Trump is so bad, so laughable, how much worse must be the loser? How devoid of any content its discourse?
Maybe they should stop making bad jokes about Putin and elaborate a message with some coherence.




The problem is neoliberalism, Sanders is spot on there. But he's just too condescending about why people don't fight against it. He says people don't know better, because they are suffering, in pain. Like if their IQ drops suddenly.
Maybe they don't fight it because they don't want to.

Neoliberalism basically generates inequalities. But Sunders should see that many people don't care as long as the ones suffering those inequalities are not them.
Maybe liberals are not against neoliberalism (in fact they are pro-Clinton), not because they don't know better (poor innocent creatures), but because they don't give a flying fuck about inequalities they don't suffer. Liberal hypocrisy is off the charts.
Maybe poor wasp of the rust belt only cares now because the tides of neoliberalism reach them now, and they chose the white supremacist option because ... well ... they are white supremacists?

Thinking that when people chose an amoral option (in his opinion of course) is because of they are "in pain", but in other circumstances they would chose the socialist way is just wishful thinking that doesn't help to solve the real problems.

[Picklock]

War.
World War III is the real answer for all this faggotry nonsense from both sides.

You all already take these "long peace" age for granted and completely forgot the true meaning of world burn in global total mobilization of mass death and destruction horror called war.

Previous humans conflicts is just a shadow little skirmish compares to the one that costs millions before.

It's time to burns your hands again to learn the lessons that will be forgotten again by your youngest generations in the future.

[toastedfeathers]

In the US 99% of deaths from terrorism have been at the hands of less than 1% of the population. Why are liberals so hell bent on getting that 1% of the population growing? Europe is even worse they have a major act of terrorism nearly every month. The fact that liberals can't acknowledge this and the fact that maybe republicans are more concerned with preventing more death and terror and less about racism is why you all lost. Its not about racism its about safety.

[joew771]

World War III is the answer. Like picklock says. Unleash the terrible destructive power of the United States upon the rest of the world and see what they can do about it. Within a month the U.S. would control half of the world. Russia would control the other half. Cuz they are almost as cool as we are. After that we just need to negotiate with russia and the 2 of us would be in charge of the entire planet. Fuck the rest of you insignificant countries. You should have tried harder.

[Aaron.Walkhouse]

In the US 99% of deaths from terrorism have been at the hands of less than 1% of the population.

Most of which are homegrown, dating back to slavery days, white sheets and lynchings.
Even now, all U.S. terrorism has been done by self-radicalized people who were born or grew up
in the U.S.A.  ‌ The only exceptions were by terrorists who traveled for the purpose, mostly from
nations considered allies not on Trump's list of so-called "terrorist exporters". ‌ Those don't count
as immigrants because they didn't even try to start a new life, instead plotting their martyrdoms.

Why are liberals so hell bent on getting that 1% of the population growing?

Immigrants are not the problem. ‌ Terrorists are. ‌ They are two different groups
that only racists and bigots of the far-right cannot distinguish from immigrants.
That some terrorists pretended to be immigrants doesn't make immigrants a threat
and stopping immigration won't stop any terrorists from entering any country.
The only thing anti-immigration extremism does is forward the cause of terrorism

Europe is even worse they have a major act of terrorism nearly every month.

France has a long-standing problem with racism and bigotry against religions they see as foreign.
Their actions against their chosen "outsiders" is what provokes retaliations. ‌ Several other bloc
nations which swung left or right have done the exact same things; getting the same results.
That's why the vast majority of their terrorists since WWII are homegrown and self-radicalized.
This serves the purposes of far-left and far-right politicians, so expect more of the same.

The fact that liberals can't acknowledge this and the fact that maybe republicans are more concerned with preventing more death and terror and less about racism is why you all lost. Its not about racism its about safety.

Safety is just the excuse. ‌ It has always been about racism for republicans
ever since they switched positions with the Democrats and embraced racism.
That they still refuse to acknowledge their deep-seated racism is why their own
policies and pundits continue to preach and carry out racism while denying it.

---

World War III is the answer. Like picklock says. Unleash the terrible destructive power of the United States upon the rest of the world and see what they can do about it.

If the Trump actually does go insane and tries it you can expect that terrible destructive power will turn on him instead.

Within a month the U.S. would control half of the world. Russia would control the other half. Cuz they are almost as cool as we are.

Being violent is in no way "cool", and no war has or ever will be as easy as zealots hope.
Afghanistan, for example, has always been seen as a poverty-stricken pushover, yet no
wannabe conqueror has ever taken control, no matter how much time and money they
threw down that hole.  ‌ Multiply that by hundreds of uncooperative nations, Canada and
Mexico included, and even the U.S. with all it's weapons will quit or commit nuclear suicide.
Uber-Cool Russia is not capable of such adventures without going broke in a few weeks.

After that we just need to negotiate with russia and the 2 of us would be in charge of the entire planet. Fuck the rest of you insignificant countries. You should have tried harder.

You don't negotiate with Putin or Trump.  ‌ Perhaps after Putin's assassination and Trump gets fired
the rest of their parties might consider rejoining the human race, in which cases who needs a war? ‌ ‌

[L3d]

well maybe he too needs to use better privacy and delete all his cookies xD

[freeaf]

Some people here are really brainwashed by the media...

Trump is the first president to do what he promised. I wish I had a Trump in my country.

I don't agree with everything he does, but mostly are right to protect USA and make USA a better country.

[joew771]

---

World War III is the answer. Like picklock says. Unleash the terrible destructive power of the United States upon the rest of the world and see what they can do about it.

If the Trump actually does go insane and tries it you can expect that terrible destructive power will turn on him instead.

Within a month the U.S. would control half of the world. Russia would control the other half. Cuz they are almost as cool as we are.

Being violent is in no way "cool", and no war has or ever will be as easy as zealots hope.
Afghanistan, for example, has always been seen as a poverty-stricken pushover, yet no
wannabe conqueror has ever taken control, no matter how much time and money they
threw down that hole.  ‌ Multiply that by hundreds of uncooperative nations, Canada and
Mexico included, and even the U.S. with all it's weapons will quit or commit nuclear suicide.
Uber-Cool Russia is not capable of such adventures without going broke in a few weeks.

I'll restrict myself to your responses to me, though I have to add that I thought that most of your other replies were also quite uniformed and near insanity.
So! The first one really quick. Trump can't launch nuclear weapons without the consent of congress and many other people actually. Even if he does go insane, most especially if he does.
Being violent is very cool. Everyone knows that.  Afghanistan could have been won by Russia or the U.S. if they had actually cared. We could have nuked them to dust or actually sent a real number of troops over there to take the country, and so could have Russia, but we didn't. IDK why we or they didn't, but I think it was a bad choice. Especially Russia. They should have just taken Afghanistan over. Not sure why they didn't.
The U.S. could easily defeat and claim both Canada and Mexico. And we probably should, so they stop either immigrating or bitching. God Canada can bitch when they rely on the U.S. for pretty much everything.
And Russia would not go broke in a few weeks lol. They could and probably would take over most of their hemisphere of the planet if we weren't around.
To be true to the op's topic, trump isn't going to do anything any more important than any of the last 5 presidents have done, since they all did nothing lasting or worthwhile.

[Aaron.Walkhouse]

Wrong on all points, kid. ‌ A perfect score! ‌ Are congratulations in order? ‌ ‌

Like I said, all those would-be conquerors thought exactly the same as you
and all, without exception, got exactly the same result, never learning why.

The U.S. might be able to roll over the governments of Canada and Mexico
but our populations are more heavily armed than any government can know
and we have a lot of highly experienced combat veterans to take the lead in
a general insurgency which will overload regular troops, providing few targets.
If Trump invaded either country he would lose even as he claimed victory.
If he invaded both it would be like Operation Barbarossa all over again, and
we would eventually be dividing up grateful states, creating new provinces. ‌ ‌

Your assumption that he has to seek permission ignores that he and his zealots
actually have effective control of Congress and Senate. ‌ They are currently taking
control of all Executive Branch departments to a degree never seen before while
he is already appointing a SCOTUS judge he should never had the opportunity
to nominate. ‌ He is currently uttering threats to courts in a bid to "work the refs"
in advance of yet more imperial decrees to reshape America to the elite's desires.


Trump, and his billionaire wrecking crew are currently dismantling America so they,
vultures all, can buy up the remnants and turn what's left into their own fiefdoms. ‌

What they will get is a Second Revolution instead.

Hopefully he will stop himself before somebody stops him by force. ‌ Unlikely. ‌ Sad! ‌

[joew771]

Wrong on all points, kid. ‌ A perfect score! ‌ Are congratulations in order? ‌ ‌

Like I said, all those would-be conquerors thought exactly the same as you
and all, without exception, got exactly the same result, never learning why.

The U.S. might be able to roll over the governments of Canada and Mexico
but our populations are more heavily armed than any government can know
and we have a lot of highly experienced combat veterans to take the lead in
a general insurgency which will overload regular troops, providing few targets.
If Trump invaded either country he would lose even as he claimed victory.
If he invaded both it would be like Operation Barbarossa all over again, and
we would eventually be dividing up grateful states, creating new provinces. ‌ ‌

Your assumption that he has to seek permission ignores that he and his zealots
actually have effective control of Congress and Senate. ‌ They are currently taking
control of all Executive Branch departments to a degree never seen before while
he is already appointing a SCOTUS judge he should never had the opportunity
to nominate. ‌ He is currently uttering threats to courts in a bid to "work the refs"
in advance of yet more imperial decrees to reshape America to the elite's desires.


Trump, and his billionaire wrecking crew are currently dismantling America so they,
vultures all, can buy up the remnants and turn what's left into their own fiefdoms. ‌

What they will get is a Second Revolution instead.

Hopefully he will stop himself before somebody stops him by force. ‌ Unlikely. ‌ Sad! ‌

First of all I have to say that I think you are totally insane or at least severly intellectually handicapped.

The U.S. could most certainly conquer Canada or Mexico if we wanted to, quite easily. I'm sure France and a few others would bitch about it, but they would shut up before too long. And saying Trump would lose something because of that is sort of silly, since it would obviously be a U.S. victory. And most of America would be probably be happy to not have to listen to the bitching of those two countries. Especially since Canada would be a nothing useless country without the U.S. in the first place. I find it laughable that Canada even tries to have it's own opinion, since they rely 100% on the U.S. to do anything at all.

And of course Trump or any president has to rely on congress and the courts. That is the basis of our government. To say that his executive branch is taking over america is a foolish statement, and unfounded by any sort of reality. We in this country have 3 branches, the executive, the judicial and the legislative. If any one of them starts acting like total dickholes, the other 2 will stop them, that's the nature of our constituition.

That's why in the past week that the judicial (the court) has stopped the executive (President Trump) from enacting his executive order.

If we lived in some sort of dictatorship that wouldn't have happened, but it did. The Courts said 'Hey executive branch' you did something you weren't supposed to do and stopped them.

And now the courts and possibly congress and the senate (the legislative branch) will sort it all out.