Jan 16, 2014, 13:43 pm
Google to face UK users in privacy row
![[Image: jgtLhze.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/jgtLhze.jpg)
Google has argued that the UK is not an appropriate venue for the court case
Google has failed in an attempt to stop a case going ahead in the UK that will decide if it illegally tracked users.
It was sued in Britain by people who said Google bypassed privacy settings in Apple's Safari browser without telling them.
Google argued that the case should be heard in the US where it is based.
On Thursday High Court Judge Michael Tugendhat said the UK was an "appropriate" jurisdiction and the case could proceed.
A group of British Google users launched the legal action in 2013 saying that the search giant had illegally tracked their online activity between summer 2011 and spring 2012.
One of the claimants, Judith Vidal-Hall, said she was delighted that Google would now have to explain its actions.
She said the group of claimants wanted to know: "What they've done with our private data, how much they have made from this, and why they keep flouting privacy laws."
Google said it would go the Court of Appeal to see if it could challenge the ruling.
Google has already been hit by sanctions over its behaviour and was fined $22.5m (£14m) by the US trade watchdog for flouting Safari security settings. It has also paid a separate $17m fine levied by attorney generals in 38 US states over its actions.
source
Google has argued that the UK is not an appropriate venue for the court case
Google has failed in an attempt to stop a case going ahead in the UK that will decide if it illegally tracked users.
It was sued in Britain by people who said Google bypassed privacy settings in Apple's Safari browser without telling them.
Google argued that the case should be heard in the US where it is based.
On Thursday High Court Judge Michael Tugendhat said the UK was an "appropriate" jurisdiction and the case could proceed.
A group of British Google users launched the legal action in 2013 saying that the search giant had illegally tracked their online activity between summer 2011 and spring 2012.
One of the claimants, Judith Vidal-Hall, said she was delighted that Google would now have to explain its actions.
She said the group of claimants wanted to know: "What they've done with our private data, how much they have made from this, and why they keep flouting privacy laws."
Google said it would go the Court of Appeal to see if it could challenge the ruling.
Google has already been hit by sanctions over its behaviour and was fined $22.5m (£14m) by the US trade watchdog for flouting Safari security settings. It has also paid a separate $17m fine levied by attorney generals in 38 US states over its actions.
source