If you had an account on forum.suprbay.org with at least one post, you do not need to re-register. Your account is still active and your Suprbay username and password will work.

Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
This week, the Komodia/Superfish scandal got even worse. So bad, in fact, that the only appropriate response was sheer sarcasm, which Rich Kulawiec provided in our most insightful comment of the week:
Quote:Oh, come now, this isn't so bad

It's not like they did something really bad, something so destructive and damaging to the privacy and security of millions of people that it required immediate attention from federal law enforcement agencies combined with the threat of aggressive prosecution that could result in decades in prison...something like, oh, I don't know, downloading scientific research papers?
Meanwhile, when we looked at the creative abuses of wireless data caps, TheResidentSkeptic took second place for insightful by boiling it down to basics:
Quote:A different viewpoint

the most ham-fisted abuse of usage caps is simply that they exist.
For editor's choice on the insightful side, we'll look at two other examples of people abusing power, the law, the market or all of the above. First up, after Total Wipes decided the word "download" meant infringement and proceeded to abuse the DMCA to take down all kinds of innocent sites, That One Guy opined on the inevitability of it all:
Quote:Natural result of a one-sided law

When a system or law has absolutely no penalty for abuse, it will be abused, and to expect anything less is foolish. Companies who file clearly bogus DMCA claims face no penalty whatsoever for doing so, even if the claims are blatantly false, yet the ones receiving them are still forced to treat them all as valid, unless they want to face harsh legal penalties.

If the DMCA was intended to be even remotely balanced, then there would be hard penalties for sending such obviously false claims, but as it stands, it's working exactly as it was intended to, completely favoring one side, at the cost of the other.
Next, though NSA director Admiral Mike Rogers said a lot of pretty worrying things about the NSA and privacy this week, Jason zeroed in on what might be the most offensive statement of them all:
Quote:Of everything said in that interview, what I personally found the most offensive was this:
Quote:“Be grateful that you live in a nation that is willing to have this kind of dialogue,” Rogers told the audience.
(from here)

We don't. We're having "this kind of dialogue"---such as it is---only because the government and intelligence community has been dragged, kicking and screaming and pronouncing the immediate doom of us all, into it.

I cycle through a lot of emotions as I keep up with all this... concern, mistrust, whatever. But comments like that make me genuinely angry.
Over on the funny side, we start out by returning to the Total Wipes story, where one anonymous commenter won first place with a different take on the whole situation:
Quote:What about me?

I have a site with a download link. Am I not important enough? Can I sue them for discrimination?
Next we head to the post about our brief Twitter exchange with revenge porn jerk/king of irony Craig Brittain, who is on a crusade against Google's supposed copyright infringement. Among the many amusing hypocrisies and general stupidities in his position, Somedumbgeek pointed out that his request for our coverage of the Perfect 10 lawsuit was among the most amusing:

At the end, when he asked where he could read about it. Did it never occur to him that he could just google it?
For editor's choice on the funny side, we start by circling back to the story about wireless data caps, where orbitalinsertion gave an excellent name to the practice of letting big companies buy "sponsored data" to route around caps (and block smaller competition):
Quote:Deep Pocket Inspection.
Last but not least, we've got an anonymous commenter who has daringly taken the side of government officials demanding a magical, un-abusable backdoor key to encrypted devices. The engineers have insisted such a thing is fundamentally impossible, but clearly they were just too lazy to hammer out the code:
Quote:It's so simple

if (guy = good){
(There appear to be some syntax errors there, including the use of an assignment operator instead of a comparison one, which would make every "guy" register as "good" automatically. Which means this approach should be just about as secure as any genuine attempt would.)

That's all for this week, folks!

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
[Image: mf.gif]

[Image: rc.img]
[Image: rc.img]
[Image: rc.img]

[Image: a2.img][Image: a2t.img][Image: feed?i=WltSwJnSyDU:gjxKkTFj18U:D7DqB2pKExk][Image: feed?d=c-S6u7MTCTE]

Originally Published: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 20:00:00 GMT

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  2021’s most dangerous software weaknesses Resurgence 0 1,227 Sep 16, 2021, 01:15 am
Last Post: Resurgence
  A most egregious abuse of state power you’ve never heard of Resurgence 0 1,090 Jul 29, 2021, 20:15 pm
Last Post: Resurgence
  Japan: Tokyo reports most daily COVID-19 cases in six months Resurgence 0 820 Jul 14, 2021, 20:25 pm
Last Post: Resurgence
  Dutch COVID-19 infections soar by 500% in a week Resurgence 0 827 Jul 13, 2021, 20:26 pm
Last Post: Resurgence
  Most new wind and solar projects will be cheaper than coal, report finds Resurgence 2 2,997 Jun 24, 2021, 15:39 pm
Last Post: Resurgence

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)