Jul 23, 2017, 14:24 pm
(This post was last modified: Jul 23, 2017, 18:22 pm by compactmuseum. Edited 3 times in total.)
https://thepiratebay.org/user/compactmuseum/ Encoder: CompactMuseum
That is to say, best observable quality in a compact, small form, with very little or nonexistent quality loss. Also of course the purpose is to add films that don't yet exist as torrents.
The main purpose is to re-encode files larger than 6 GB into a more compact form. So, for example smaller files should not even be touched, because there would be quality loss almost always. It is only the large, over 10 000 kb/s files, that can be re-encoded into smaller files, while preserving quality. Usually the result is somewhere between 2 and 5 GB for feature films. Usually 1080 progressive scan (1080p) and x265 codec with 10-bit color depth per channel would be preferred. Sometimes, however, it is good to re-encode some smaller files too, for example for redusing noise or blocking. But the file size would often be even larger than the original.
All the material gets checked and tested with multiple settings, so that the encoding doesn't have too much impact on the picture or sound (which is often not re-encoded), but so that the file is small enough. The levels and results depends on the material. For example preserving film grain takes very much space, whereas some cartoons can be compressed very much.
https://thepiratebay.org/user/compactmuseum/
That is to say, best observable quality in a compact, small form, with very little or nonexistent quality loss. Also of course the purpose is to add films that don't yet exist as torrents.
The main purpose is to re-encode files larger than 6 GB into a more compact form. So, for example smaller files should not even be touched, because there would be quality loss almost always. It is only the large, over 10 000 kb/s files, that can be re-encoded into smaller files, while preserving quality. Usually the result is somewhere between 2 and 5 GB for feature films. Usually 1080 progressive scan (1080p) and x265 codec with 10-bit color depth per channel would be preferred. Sometimes, however, it is good to re-encode some smaller files too, for example for redusing noise or blocking. But the file size would often be even larger than the original.
All the material gets checked and tested with multiple settings, so that the encoding doesn't have too much impact on the picture or sound (which is often not re-encoded), but so that the file is small enough. The levels and results depends on the material. For example preserving film grain takes very much space, whereas some cartoons can be compressed very much.
https://thepiratebay.org/user/compactmuseum/