Bill Gates wants to eat your soul

[Fant0men]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSvhPnUgyz8

We need to bring out the guillotine and end this man's life before he ends civilization with his bullshit vaccines and de-population agenda. Pay attention to his psychopathic smirk (also known as "duper's delight") whenever there's talk about people dying, sickness and tragedy in the world. Anyone born with a silver spoon in his mouth can do what this guy did, he had help from high up every step of the way. I don't think he's even that good a programmer or he wouldn't have created the epic clusterfuck known as Microsoft Windows.

Use GNU/Linux and be a part of the revolution. Fuck Billy Boi, his "philantropy" and his shady-ass software.

Go on YouTube and listen to some talks by Richard Stallman, and be educated about how to create a free and open digital society based on the sharing of software source code. He's a fucking legend. I don't care if he picks off skin flaps from his feet and chews on them. He's right about free software and he has done more for the world of computing than psycho Bill has ever done. The fact that he was canceled and forced to resign from FSF is a fucking tragedy. Eric S. Raymond is another legend that got canceled for speaking out against the SJW bitches who have infiltrated the open source movement, don't know how to code or even care about software or technology in general. Seriously, these hoes and man-bitches have been sent by Satan to take down the world of open source.

If you look at their bank history you'll probably find big fat checks from Billy G and Microsoft.

[dueda]

He really looks like Mr. Burns (from The Simpsons). 'Nuff said.

[RobertX]

Actually, Windows is one of the greatest inventions of humankind if he did have help.

However, I am not thoroughly impressed that he is a philantropist (how do you spell that?!?). There are many people out there that did more than what he claimed to have done and they were never credited for it.

So I call bullshit on that one.

[waregim]

Though I have never heard of Raymond, as a Discordian - I regard Stallman as nothing less than a god. And an Aspie.
(Same difference).

Gates is a Malthusian Eugenicist, like his father. These are the folks that *inspired* the Nazis. Really.
He was not a programmer (Allen was),at college he majored in poker, and used a bought copy of DOS to bluff IBM into thinking M$ was a real software corp. Windows was taken as a freebie from Xerox.

While I will fully concur that M$ is booger infested corporate crap, the SOBs early on lawyered up and patented the crap out of everything beyond a shell prompt. That allowed them to build a real and efficient microkernel, that Stallman(bless his name) was never able to do. But he did create Linux, as without GNU - Linus' kernel would have gone nowhere.

But in the meantime, Linux has become the b!tch of Redhat, slavishly folowing their 'innovations' like the Lennus crap. Debian Corp. was the first to fall, and even Arch is infested. And of course there is Canonical. While I am writing this in Buster I am feverishly looking to totally decouple from the repo nightmare of 'upgrades' where not needed. At least on Win I can upgrade to Python 3.8 without removing half my effing install. I guess I can do it also in Debian but its going to be a rough hack.

I do have a Debian mirror with source but it presents difficulties I normally do not see in Win. Where I can run pretty much run any 32 or 64 bit code and where even Linux has ports in Cygwin. (SUA is a joke). Of course M$ is trying to deprecate 7, and some apps wont work in it now, but I can always run them on a VM or my laptop.

To put it simply, I am disappointed in both Win and Lennux.

Gates is a pathetic minion of the real Masters of Destruction. He is not bright enough to be truly evil like a Soros.
I can respect Soros and his ilk for their patience and craft for trying to destroy Western Civilisation. Gates is too banal, and not even sufficiently warped and twisted like Jobs.

I'd play a game of cards with him, but only if he had short sleeves on.

So we may argue, and even agree that Win is the spawn of a malevolent demon, I believe I can also make the argument that Linux/Gnu started out pure as the driven snow in Finland and MIT - that DARPA, Redhat and other greedy bassturds have been turning that snow yellow with their excresences.

Next week I'll brobably be back in Win where my 'permissions' issues are uncommon, and I dont have to recompile programs to quit messing around with UID0.

[Spud17]

For anyone who thinks Bill Gates is just some insignificant, old charitable guy who should be applauded, I recommend watching all 4 of these corbett report videos. These aren't conspiracies btw, they're all open facts, but the truth is whitewashed and hidden by PR bullshit.

(the 4th vid is the one Fant0men posted, but I thought I'd embed it with the other 3)









The problem isn't just Bill Gates though, he's just one man. He could die tomorrow and the ideology would still exist. The plan to reduce and control the earths population is a long term project that has been going on since the days of francis galton, and will continue after Gates' death, and that's the real problem.

There are things we can all do to resist being treated like livestock though. Say no to test and trace, say no to the vaccines, research your own news and information instead of having it drip-fed to you, question everything, limit/end your exposure to social media, and say no to a cashless society. If you need to pay digitally for things like VPN fees or a seedbox etc, consider using bitcoin instead of going through the big corporations.

Some reading on why going cashless is bad for all of us: 

https://www.aclu.org/blog/privacy-techno...ess-stores

Vive la resistance.

[waregim]

The issue of cashless goes far beyond dispossessing the poor and illegal immigrants. A simple fix would be the mandating of a federalized system such as re-establishing a post office bank and offering debit cards to all depositors.

The issue is that of effective confiscation of existing cash as well as total control of all economic pursuits.
And effectivel enslavement of the proles to the whims of banksters.

But most of all, it would portend that the system be under the control of the Central Banks in general, and the Bank of International Settlements in particular. People who could not only take away your midget porn, but also haircut your bank accounts at their whim, and prevent once and for all - every banksters dream: A Bank Run.

Billy G. is a tadpole to those monsters who routinely rape nations. IMF Shock Therapy coming to a location near you!

[Fant0men]

Actually, Windows is one of the greatest inventions of humankind if he did have help.

I strongly disagree. There have been lots of other systems that are technologically superior and better designed than Windows, but due to Microsoft's monopoly those other systems have all died, and those companies went out of business. I'm thinking of Be Inc., that launched BeOS, as an example. Microsoft has mainly maintained their monopoly by forcing hardware manufacturers (OEMs) to only pre-install Windows on their PCs and nothing else. If they decide to also offer Linux, for example, then they have to pay more for the Windows licenses as a result. People mainly use what comes pre-installed on their PC. Had Linux come pre-installed, its userbase would grow exponentially, and software developers would start making more programs and games for it. What people mainly mean when they say Windows is great, is that it's great that it has a lot of programs and games available for it, but that's all due to Microsoft's monopoly and has nothing to do with Windows being well designed.

waregim

---

But in the meantime, Linux has become the b!tch of Redhat, slavishly folowing their 'innovations' like the Lennus crap.

Red Hat was one of the first Linux companies and vital to bringing money into Linux, as a result getting other big IT companies (like IBM, Intel etc.) interested in open source. Money corrupts, but at the same time it's necessary if you want to get big things done in today's world. When it comes to things like Systemd, PulseAudio and Wayland (all Red Hat projects by now IIRC), I think all of those were a major technological step forward from what we had before. There are still issues of course, but I think people are overreacting with paranoia over Systemd for example.



I have three good videos about Systemd here:











The first of those videos is probably the most informative when it comes to the technological side of Systemd.

waregim

---

Gates is too banal, and not even sufficiently warped and twisted like Jobs.

I'm not inclined to hate Jobs as much as Gates. I don't think they were on the same level of depravity and evil. The main thing I dislike about Jobs and Apple is that they lock down their products physically and in software, for it to be like a closed little ecosystem and incompatible with things outside of that walled garden. Also the price issue; I don't appreciate that Mac hardware is so expensive. But other than that, Apple has consistently been making products that are of higher quality than what Microsoft offers. Take macOS (OS X) as an example. It is much more user friendly, stable, secure and modern than Windows. I like that Apple has always been focused on design, and has clear human interface guidelines for macOS. They have gotten many things right in their UI. For one thing, their window manager is still better than anything on the Linux (or Windows) side of things. And having one unified menu bar at the top of the screen, which simply changes depending on what program / window you have in focus, de-clutters the desktop, minimizes waste of pixels on the screen and makes the menu easier to find.

Spud17

---

The problem isn't just Bill Gates though, he's just one man. He could die tomorrow and the ideology would still exist. The plan to reduce and control the earths population is a long term project that has been going on since the days of francis galton, and will continue after Gates' death, and that's the real problem.

Agreed. The ideology of eugenics and that rich people are superior in every way to poor people, and more valuable... that's an old mindset. The aristocratic elite have always had that mindset, because they're all psychopaths. Acting in a psychopathic and devious way is how you get that kind of power to begin with. Once you look far enough back in history, all those super rich families have a really shady and suspicious past, how they got their money etc. Take the Rothschild family as an example. It was always done in a bad way.

dueda

---

He really looks like Mr. Burns (from The Simpsons). 'Nuff said.

Indeed.

[waregim]

Most of the 'superiority' of MacOs is due to their use of integrated hardware in the days before SOA, and the fact that add-on cards with the ancient busses used had timing problems, so slower speeds. That is not an issue anymore. And since they went to x86, even there the playing field has levelled.
What they did was take Linux, bastardize and privatize the hell out of it, to make it as friendly as hell to the technologically incompetent. Take the GUI for example. It *should* be the least important consideration for a real system. It may be stable, but these days so is Win and Linux as long as you dont tinker under the hood with any of them.
As far as desktop icons, I fully prefer them to the 'modern' crap desktops that more resemble toy phone screens.

Personallly I find Win to be more hackable than Linux, whose every freaking update can wipe months of careful tweaking. Of course Win will do the same, but I simply disable most of the crap services, Updates included. And the first to go are Themes and nearly all the GUI eye candy. I like my icons, but nothing else on the desktop. Except perhaps for the applet bar in Mate, where I can see at all times disk, memory, cpu and network activity. I have also blocked updates on Buster, but I am seeing that some wanted upgrades would wipe the system. I'll hack Python 3.8 into it.

Though I havent had much experience with Apple since I boycotted them in 1982 for being greedy shysters whose main excellence was in the use of Bernay's humbug marketing scams, I have seen others state that the KDE desktop was more user friendly than MacOs.

As to Lennux. Today alone I have had to eradicate arecord and caja due to aberrant behaior apparently related to systemd (and/or Pulse). Apparently not all systemd crap is started in /etc/systemd (where the del button works fine. ) I'd wipe Pulse, but I had problems in the past with the audio after an unwanted partial system update, and since its working now, I ant gonna fix it.

Once upon a time Linux had pretty unlimited freedoms to personalize. But little by little it is being eradicated, particularly in the name of a form of system security that I am simply not interested in. I have my own security methods and protocols which work fine on a single user system, and my next target for annihilation is Pam. And by personalization I dont give a rats azz about GUI eyecandy. I mean the elimination of the OS ability to contradict any direct command. Becuase the pinhead authors decided answering stupid questions would be too bothersome. And finding the lines in the source code can be irksome, to say the least.

At least with Win I know who the enemy is and can take steps to get around the issues. I have to use pcmanfm to get around the lack of icons on Mate since an update wiped them and nothing seems to revive them, and google and the forums are useless. On Win I can disable UAC, and Explorer functions are integral to the system. On Linux wiping SeLinux is just a baby step, with desktop managers utterly haphazard in design and permissions. I klilled Wayland a long time ago, and luckily it hasnt reared its head since.

And we wont even get into the issues of drivers here.

And while I would agree that korporate input has increased the technological sophistication wway past vim and emacs, it has come at the price of motivation for innovation for things like unfettered freeware VMs and the like. Look at VirtualBox. Basically chained to an Oracle fence. Firefox? Mozilla ran wild with it, and keeps shutting down private addons, under the 'security' excuse. If Linux is condemend to become a consumption OS like Win, then why move from Win?

While the main advantage at present is that Linux is still far behind the Win crowds slow heridng into the paywall cloud APIs, there certainly is a threat that the korporate 'sponsors' will sooner or later demand their pound of flesh. It seems to be starting with some science apps, whose names escape me at the moment.

With the advent of hidden cores no system, Linux or Win is safe from a real cyberattack. Where filesystem based security is a joke.

Keep in mind that jacob Rothschild was himself the pawn of the German elite, who used jews for mercantile side hustles that would have ruined their reputations. Some link these folk to the Masons, others to some nebulous 'illuminati'. Its hard to tell but what we do know is that the elite have separate agendas from the lumpenproletariat. Interesting is a video done by the som of the CEO of Johnson&Johnson who documented that special classes were given in the homes of that 'class' specifically on the advantages and the hazards of their positions.
Carroll Quigly comes to mind. As to who writes the curricula.

A later Rothschild had JP Morgan as a pet pawn.

[Fant0men]

...
What they did was take Linux, bastardize and privatize the hell out of it, to make it as friendly as hell to the technologically incompetent.

...

Though I havent had much experience with Apple since I boycotted them in 1982 for being greedy shysters whose main excellence was in the use of Bernay's humbug marketing scams, I have seen others state that the KDE desktop was more user friendly than MacOs.

They didn't use Linux. Modern macOS is based partly on FreeBSD, and partly on the Mach microkernel (although a modern version of it called "OSFMK"). The line of macOS in use currently was first released back in 2001 (as "OS X"). It has nothing in common with OS9 (or any of the older versions). I don't think a single line of code is shared, TBH, due to the vast difference in architecture. The design of the GUI is also completely different from the older versions of macOS.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XNU

[Fant0men]

What happened to everyone? Did you take Bill Gates' vaccines and die? Lol.